Skip to main content

Jury Gives Written Order To Amber Heard To Pay Johnny Depp $10.35 Million

 The judge has passed a written order for American actress Amber Heard to pay her ex-husband Johnny Depp $10.35 million for damaging his reputation through her op-ed.

The written order for Heard has been passed recently. She has been held accountable for damaging Depp's reputation by describing herself as a domestic abuse victim in an op-ed piece she wrote in The Washington Post in December 2018. 

According to media reports, judge Penney Azcarate entered a judgment order into the court record after a brief hearing in Fairfax County Circuit Court. The judge ordered Heard to pay $10.35 million to Depp. The judge also ordered Depp to pay Heard $2 million, the jury's award on her counterclaim that she was defamed by one of Depp's lawyers.

Johnny Depp-Amber Heard case

The jury announced its verdict on June 1. Over the six-week televised trial, the case gained particular attention on the internet. Depp won the defamation case against Heard. Depp will receive more than $10 million in damages.

During the trial, both actors revealed lurid details of their short marriage. A lot of people also signed petitions to get Heard removed from Aquaman 2. People on social media took Depp’s side. After losing the defamation case, she reportedly said, "I don’t care what one thinks about me.”

Earlier, the jury had said that Depp should receive $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, but the judge reduced the punitive damages award to $350,000 under a state cap.

Heard reportedly said she plans to appeal the final verdict. Heard’s lawyer Elaine Charlson Bredehoft said that the American actress cannot pay such a hefty amount.

If Heard appeals, she must post a bond for the full amount of the $10.35 million awards while the appeal is pending. The judge's order also claimed that both awards are subject to 6% interest per year.

Jury Gives Written Order To Amber Heard To Pay Johnny Depp


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Syria Condemns Israeli Incursion into Beit Jinn, Holds Israel Responsible for Escalation

 Syria strongly condemned an Israeli military incursion into the town of Beit Jinn in rural Damascus, denouncing the assault on civilians and their property, which resulted in casualties and widespread panic. In an official statement, the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the incursion as a war crime, stating it followed Israel’s failed attempt to target the town. The ministry held Israeli authorities fully responsible for the aggression and its consequences. Syria called on the UN Security Council, the United Nations, and the Arab League to take urgent action to halt repeated violations. It reaffirmed its commitment to defending its sovereignty and people through all means permitted under international law.

Israel issues latest forced evacuation order in areas in Khan Younis

  The Israeli army’s Arabic-language spokesperson, Avichay Adraee, has issued the latest forced evacuation order for civilians living in nine areas in Khan Younis, southern Gaza. Adraee said that the army was expanding its operation and “intensifying sudden and concentrated firepower”. The spokesperson called on residents to evacuate westward. So-called Israeli safe zones, including Al-Mawasi in Khan Younis, are routinely attacked despite the army forcing Palestinians to move to those areas.

Bombay High Court Restricts Bursting of Firecrackers in Mumbai During Diwali to These Timings

  The festival of Diwali, often referred to as the "Festival of Lights," is celebrated with great enthusiasm and fervor across India. While the tradition of lighting lamps and bursting firecrackers has been an integral part of the festivities, concerns over air pollution and its adverse effects on public health have prompted authorities to regulate the use of fireworks. The Bombay High Court , in a recent decision, has imposed restrictions on the bursting of firecrackers in Mumbai during Diwali, specifying designated timings to minimize the environmental impact. In an effort to strike a balance between celebrating the festival and safeguarding the environment, the Bombay High Court issued a directive that restricts the use of firecrackers to specific time slots. The court's decision is a response to the rising concerns about air quality and noise pollution during Diwali, which often reaches hazardous levels in several Indian cities. These timings aim to strike a balance b...