Skip to main content

Former Rajasthan chief minister Ashok Gehlot cornered for refusal to drop sitting MLAs

 

Former Rajasthan chief minister Ashok Gehlot cornered for refusal to drop sitting MLAs

Ashok Gehlot, the former Chief Minister of Rajasthan, faced criticism during a Congress review meeting for his decision not to replace sitting MLAs despite widespread anti-incumbency sentiments. The prevailing sentiment among attendees was that a more strategic selection of candidates could have potentially saved Gehlot's government.

Gehlot defended his stance by citing the MLAs' support during a previous rebellion, but this justification failed to appease the majority at the meeting. Many participants pointed to the inadequate selection of candidates, noting that surveys had indicated strong public displeasure with most Congress MLAs.

During the meeting, Rahul Gandhi disagreed with Gehlot's assessment that the Rajasthan Assembly polls had turned into a Hindu-Muslim battle due to the BJP's polarizing tactics. Rahul argued that divisive politics had a limited impact.

Despite Rahul's attempts to convince Gehlot to replace approximately 40 MLAs, the former Chief Minister remained resistant. The majority of MLAs on the "suspect list" were subsequently defeated, including senior ministers whom Gehlot had supported.

There is a divide within the Congress central leadership regarding whether to undertake an immediate organizational overhaul in states where the party suffered defeats. Some are cautious, considering the proximity of the 2024 general election, while others advocate for a fresh approach to generate voter interest.

Congress sources revealed that the party leadership is hesitant to implement major changes, especially amid speculation about the government potentially advancing the general election after inaugurating the Ayodhya Ram temple in January.

While some acknowledge the need for changes before the elections, others argue against introducing new leadership, suggesting that leaders like Kamal Nath, Ashok Gehlot, and Bhupesh Baghel should continue in their roles.

However, a younger faction within the party opposes maintaining the status quo, asserting that the Congress should present a new leadership and vision instead of relying on leaders with decades of experience. This group holds leaders like Kamal Nath and Gehlot responsible for defeats in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, attributing the losses to overconfidence and a lack of team spirit under their leadership.

The unexpected defeats in Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh have caused concern within the Congress. Rahul Gandhi, acknowledging the urgency, canceled his foreign tour and conducted review meetings for Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Mizoram within a week of the election results.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bangladesh Military Expresses Discontent Over Chinese Weapons; Reports 'Sub-Standard' and Faulty Parts

  Bangladesh, a traditional buyer of Chinese military equipment, has raised grievances with Beijing regarding the delivery of defective components and technical malfunctions in its imported military hardware. This issue is not unique to Bangladesh, as other nations like Myanmar have also encountered problems with Chinese fighter jets, according to an ET report. Experts in the Chinese defense industry argue that Beijing lacks the expertise to manufacture highly sophisticated military hardware and is not yet considered a top-tier producer of modern defense equipment. They claim that much of China's weapon systems are based on outdated technology copied from the West. Developing countries often opt for Chinese weapons due to their lower cost compared to similar systems from Western countries. China sells arms through state-run export organizations like the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), NORINCO, and CVIC. Sources familiar with the matter told ET that the Bangladesh mil...

Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood: A Call for Global Awareness

  Jordanian authorities successfully dismantled a terrorist group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood which caused discussions regarding the organization's contributions to regional instability. The incident emphasizes the necessity of a new assessment process to understand how the world views and classifies the organization. A  Legacy of Extremism The Muslim Brotherhood established its operations in Egypt during 1928 and remains a disputed organization to this day. Numerous confirmed links between the organization and extremist activities arise while it claims to be a socio-political movement. Egypt established the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization under state law in 2013 due to its active participation in national acts of violence and attempted toppling of the government. Counter Extremism Project A systematic evaluation of the Muslim Brotherhood proves that its ideology serves as inspiration to various terrorist groups. The Counter Extremism Project  verifies...

Exposing How the Muslim Brotherhood Fuels Instability Behind a Political Facade

  The Muslim Brotherhood started in Egypt during 1928 since then it has portrayed itself as a combination of political organization and social movement working for Islamic values and governance. jinakata the Brotherhood displays an intricate web that connects extremist concepts and violent deeds which produce regional turmoil. The Ideological Foundations The Brotherhood bases its ideology upon the teachings of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. Extremist groups obtain their core beliefs from the writings specifically authored by Qutb. The Brotherhood's concept of jihad for creating an Islamic state has directly inspired al-Qaeda and ISIS to establish their extremist agendas thus creating a direct link between those groups and the movement. Historical Links to Extremism Over and above its philosophical standards The Brotherhood maintains extensive power. Notably: Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden developed extremist beliefs because he learned Brotherhood religious doctrine in his early...