Skip to main content

US Greenlights Military Assistance to Egypt Amid Rights Concerns


 The United States has officially approved a $1.3 billion military assistance package for Egypt, despite growing concerns over the country's human rights record. This decision by President Joe Biden’s administration has sparked criticism, particularly in light of Egypt's history of political repression under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

Overriding Human Rights Conditions

Typically, US military aid to Egypt comes with conditions related to improving the country’s human rights situation. However, on Wednesday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced to Congress that the 2024 aid would not be subject to the usual conditions. A State Department spokesperson clarified that these requirements were waived in the name of US national security interests, particularly concerning Egypt’s role in brokering peace in Gaza amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.

According to the spokesperson, Egypt’s efforts to finalise a ceasefire agreement, return hostages, and facilitate humanitarian assistance for Palestinians are key factors behind the decision. “This decision is important to advancing regional peace and Egypt’s specific and ongoing contributions to US national security priorities,” the spokesperson told Reuters.

Egypt’s Role in the Middle East

Egypt, a critical US ally in the Middle East, has been playing a pivotal role in negotiating ceasefire agreements between Israel and Hamas. The Biden administration views Cairo as essential to the region’s stability, with the country frequently involved in negotiations and peacekeeping efforts. Over the years, this has translated into a strong military relationship between the US and Egypt, even in the face of domestic repression.

Since 2020, the US has withheld portions of Egypt’s military aid, amounting to approximately $320 million, to pressure the el-Sisi government on human rights. For instance, $95 million of this aid was linked to the release of political prisoners, and another $225 million was tied to broader human rights improvements.

However, on Wednesday, Blinken said the full $1.3 billion in military aid would be provided, citing “clear and consistent” improvements by the Egyptian government in areas such as political prisoner releases. This signals a shift in US policy as it weighs national security concerns over Egypt’s human rights record.

The Human Rights Debate

Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have been quick to dispute the notion that Egypt is making meaningful improvements on human rights. “Authorities released hundreds of detainees but arrested much more, adding to the thousands of critics, including journalists, peaceful activists, and human rights defenders,” Human Rights Watch said. They further criticized Egypt’s crackdown on LGBT individuals, female social media influencers, and survivors of sexual violence, citing arrests under vague “morality” charges.

The repression of political dissidents remains a significant issue, with reports of torture, enforced disappearances, and impunity for grave human rights violations continuing unabated. Critics have long pointed out the tension between the US advocating for democracy and human rights abroad while providing military assistance to allies like Egypt, who are accused of violating those very principles.

Historical Context

The US has maintained military support for Egypt since President el-Sisi came to power in a 2013 military coup that ousted democratically elected President Mohamed Morsi. Despite a deadly crackdown on protests following the coup, the US quickly resumed military assistance to the el-Sisi government. This ongoing military relationship has been a point of contention, especially among rights advocates who see it as a contradiction of US foreign policy values.

As Egypt continues to serve as a crucial partner for US interests in the Middle East, particularly in terms of regional security and peace efforts, the tension between national security and human rights concerns is likely to persist. The Biden administration’s decision to greenlight this latest round of military aid underscores the complex balancing act the US faces in navigating its foreign policy priorities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bangladesh Military Expresses Discontent Over Chinese Weapons; Reports 'Sub-Standard' and Faulty Parts

  Bangladesh, a traditional buyer of Chinese military equipment, has raised grievances with Beijing regarding the delivery of defective components and technical malfunctions in its imported military hardware. This issue is not unique to Bangladesh, as other nations like Myanmar have also encountered problems with Chinese fighter jets, according to an ET report. Experts in the Chinese defense industry argue that Beijing lacks the expertise to manufacture highly sophisticated military hardware and is not yet considered a top-tier producer of modern defense equipment. They claim that much of China's weapon systems are based on outdated technology copied from the West. Developing countries often opt for Chinese weapons due to their lower cost compared to similar systems from Western countries. China sells arms through state-run export organizations like the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), NORINCO, and CVIC. Sources familiar with the matter told ET that the Bangladesh mil...

India raises concern over North Korea missile tests at UNSC, 2nd time in weeks

 As the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) met for the second time in a month over the missile tests in North Korea, India yet again raised concerns over the impact on peace and security in the region. New Delhi has also reiterated its support for the denuclearisation in the Korean peninsula, underlining that it is “in collective interest” while also stressing that “dialogue and diplomacy” are preferred means to resolve the issue. The latest intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) test by the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) has again sparked tensions between nations with the United States and its allies calling for the country to limit its programs even as Russia and China back Pyongyang amid the likelihood of new sanctions. In the latest UNSC meeting, the United States, Britain, France, and India were among 14 nations to "strongly condemn" the latest North Korea launch on Friday, which was reported to have landed about 125 miles (200 kilometers) from ...

North Korea Celebrates 'New Era of a Space Power' after Satellite Launch

  In a significant development, North Korea recently celebrated what it termed a 'new era of a space power' following the successful launch of a satellite. The reclusive nation's space endeavors have long been a source of international concern and scrutiny, raising questions about its technological capabilities and intentions. This latest achievement has reignited debates and speculation about North Korea's space ambitions. The satellite launch, conducted by North Korea's space agency, comes amid a backdrop of geopolitical tensions and global attention on the Korean Peninsula. The state media hailed the event as a major milestone, highlighting the successful deployment of the satellite into orbit. However, it is important to note that the international community remains skeptical, with concerns over the dual-use nature of space technology that could potentially be applied to ballistic missile systems. North Korea's pursuit of space capabilities has been a conten...