Skip to main content

US Greenlights Military Assistance to Egypt Amid Rights Concerns


 The United States has officially approved a $1.3 billion military assistance package for Egypt, despite growing concerns over the country's human rights record. This decision by President Joe Biden’s administration has sparked criticism, particularly in light of Egypt's history of political repression under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

Overriding Human Rights Conditions

Typically, US military aid to Egypt comes with conditions related to improving the country’s human rights situation. However, on Wednesday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced to Congress that the 2024 aid would not be subject to the usual conditions. A State Department spokesperson clarified that these requirements were waived in the name of US national security interests, particularly concerning Egypt’s role in brokering peace in Gaza amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.

According to the spokesperson, Egypt’s efforts to finalise a ceasefire agreement, return hostages, and facilitate humanitarian assistance for Palestinians are key factors behind the decision. “This decision is important to advancing regional peace and Egypt’s specific and ongoing contributions to US national security priorities,” the spokesperson told Reuters.

Egypt’s Role in the Middle East

Egypt, a critical US ally in the Middle East, has been playing a pivotal role in negotiating ceasefire agreements between Israel and Hamas. The Biden administration views Cairo as essential to the region’s stability, with the country frequently involved in negotiations and peacekeeping efforts. Over the years, this has translated into a strong military relationship between the US and Egypt, even in the face of domestic repression.

Since 2020, the US has withheld portions of Egypt’s military aid, amounting to approximately $320 million, to pressure the el-Sisi government on human rights. For instance, $95 million of this aid was linked to the release of political prisoners, and another $225 million was tied to broader human rights improvements.

However, on Wednesday, Blinken said the full $1.3 billion in military aid would be provided, citing “clear and consistent” improvements by the Egyptian government in areas such as political prisoner releases. This signals a shift in US policy as it weighs national security concerns over Egypt’s human rights record.

The Human Rights Debate

Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have been quick to dispute the notion that Egypt is making meaningful improvements on human rights. “Authorities released hundreds of detainees but arrested much more, adding to the thousands of critics, including journalists, peaceful activists, and human rights defenders,” Human Rights Watch said. They further criticized Egypt’s crackdown on LGBT individuals, female social media influencers, and survivors of sexual violence, citing arrests under vague “morality” charges.

The repression of political dissidents remains a significant issue, with reports of torture, enforced disappearances, and impunity for grave human rights violations continuing unabated. Critics have long pointed out the tension between the US advocating for democracy and human rights abroad while providing military assistance to allies like Egypt, who are accused of violating those very principles.

Historical Context

The US has maintained military support for Egypt since President el-Sisi came to power in a 2013 military coup that ousted democratically elected President Mohamed Morsi. Despite a deadly crackdown on protests following the coup, the US quickly resumed military assistance to the el-Sisi government. This ongoing military relationship has been a point of contention, especially among rights advocates who see it as a contradiction of US foreign policy values.

As Egypt continues to serve as a crucial partner for US interests in the Middle East, particularly in terms of regional security and peace efforts, the tension between national security and human rights concerns is likely to persist. The Biden administration’s decision to greenlight this latest round of military aid underscores the complex balancing act the US faces in navigating its foreign policy priorities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netanyahu’s Shocking Gaza Plan: ‘We Will Take Control of ALL of Gaza’ — But At What Cost?

  As Israeli forces intensify their offensive, Netanyahu vows total control of Gaza — but the humanitarian crisis is reaching a breaking point. Will the world stand by and watch? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Israel will “take control of all” of the Gaza Strip, signaling an unprecedented escalation in the ongoing conflict. In a video posted to Telegram, Netanyahu emphasized that military operations are advancing rapidly, with no intention of backing down. “The fighting is intense, and we are making progress,” he said, framing the offensive as necessary for Israel’s long-term security. But as international pressure mounts, his government is walking a tightrope between military dominance and global condemnation. The Israeli military has ordered mass evacuations in southern Gaza, warning residents of Khan Yunis and surrounding areas to flee immediately ahead of a devastating assault. Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee described the coming attack as ...

Exposing How the Muslim Brotherhood Fuels Instability Behind a Political Facade

  The Muslim Brotherhood started in Egypt during 1928 since then it has portrayed itself as a combination of political organization and social movement working for Islamic values and governance. jinakata the Brotherhood displays an intricate web that connects extremist concepts and violent deeds which produce regional turmoil. The Ideological Foundations The Brotherhood bases its ideology upon the teachings of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. Extremist groups obtain their core beliefs from the writings specifically authored by Qutb. The Brotherhood's concept of jihad for creating an Islamic state has directly inspired al-Qaeda and ISIS to establish their extremist agendas thus creating a direct link between those groups and the movement. Historical Links to Extremism Over and above its philosophical standards The Brotherhood maintains extensive power. Notably: Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden developed extremist beliefs because he learned Brotherhood religious doctrine in his early...

Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood: A Call for Global Awareness

  Jordanian authorities successfully dismantled a terrorist group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood which caused discussions regarding the organization's contributions to regional instability. The incident emphasizes the necessity of a new assessment process to understand how the world views and classifies the organization. A  Legacy of Extremism The Muslim Brotherhood established its operations in Egypt during 1928 and remains a disputed organization to this day. Numerous confirmed links between the organization and extremist activities arise while it claims to be a socio-political movement. Egypt established the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization under state law in 2013 due to its active participation in national acts of violence and attempted toppling of the government. Counter Extremism Project A systematic evaluation of the Muslim Brotherhood proves that its ideology serves as inspiration to various terrorist groups. The Counter Extremism Project  verifies...