Skip to main content

Lebanon’s Ceasefire Under Serious Threat: Can Israel and Hezbollah Avoid Another War?

 

After months of escalating violence, a tentative ceasefire was brokered between Israel and Hezbollah, but recent developments have thrown its future into question. Deadly Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon have once again brought the region to the brink of conflict, and Hezbollah's mortar attacks in response suggest that the fragile peace may not last much longer. As the two sides trade blows, fears are rising that the ceasefire, which was meant to end over a year of hostilities, could collapse entirely.

On Monday evening, Israeli warplanes launched a series of strikes across southern Lebanon, killing at least ten people, including civilians. The strikes were reportedly aimed at Hezbollah positions, with the Israeli military claiming to have hit terrorist infrastructure and launchers. However, Hezbollah’s mortar fire earlier in the day at an Israeli military base has raised questions about who is truly at fault for the recent escalation. Despite the lack of casualties from the mortar fire, both sides appear determined to hold their ground, complicating efforts to maintain the ceasefire.

The fragile ceasefire was agreed upon after weeks of intense fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, which began in October 2023 following Hezbollah’s rocket attacks in support of Palestinians in Gaza. Since then, both sides have been engaged in a series of violent exchanges, with Lebanon suffering the brunt of the damage. Over 3,960 people in Lebanon have been killed in the conflict, many of them civilians, and one million others displaced. The situation has become dire, and the international community is watching closely to see if the ceasefire can hold under these mounting pressures.

The ceasefire agreement, negotiated by the United States and France, included provisions for both Israeli forces and Hezbollah to withdraw from the contested region around the Blue Line and the Litani River. However, reports of continued Israeli strikes and Hezbollah’s ongoing presence south of the Litani River suggest that both parties are violating the terms of the agreement. While the U.S. has insisted that the ceasefire is holding “largely,” the situation remains precarious. Lebanon’s political leaders, particularly those allied with Hezbollah, have condemned Israeli actions as violations of the agreement, further escalating tensions.

Israel’s response to Hezbollah’s mortar attacks has been to intensify its strikes, targeting both Hezbollah fighters and infrastructure. The Israeli military has made it clear that any further violations will not be tolerated, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has vowed to continue enforcing the ceasefire. However, this hardline stance risks pushing the region toward further conflict, as Hezbollah has vowed to continue its operations in response to what it views as Israeli provocations. The conflict has become a vicious cycle of retaliation, with each side accusing the other of breaching the ceasefire.

As the situation in Lebanon deteriorates, the role of international mediators becomes increasingly important. The U.S., France, Israel, Lebanon, and the UN peacekeeping force have all been tasked with overseeing the ceasefire and ensuring that both sides adhere to its terms. However, with each breach, the credibility of the ceasefire is weakened. If no resolution is reached, Lebanon risks plunging back into full-scale war, with devastating consequences for both countries and the broader region. The international community must act quickly to prevent further escalation and ensure that the ceasefire holds long enough to allow for a lasting peace agreement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bangladesh Military Expresses Discontent Over Chinese Weapons; Reports 'Sub-Standard' and Faulty Parts

  Bangladesh, a traditional buyer of Chinese military equipment, has raised grievances with Beijing regarding the delivery of defective components and technical malfunctions in its imported military hardware. This issue is not unique to Bangladesh, as other nations like Myanmar have also encountered problems with Chinese fighter jets, according to an ET report. Experts in the Chinese defense industry argue that Beijing lacks the expertise to manufacture highly sophisticated military hardware and is not yet considered a top-tier producer of modern defense equipment. They claim that much of China's weapon systems are based on outdated technology copied from the West. Developing countries often opt for Chinese weapons due to their lower cost compared to similar systems from Western countries. China sells arms through state-run export organizations like the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), NORINCO, and CVIC. Sources familiar with the matter told ET that the Bangladesh mil...

UAE-India CEPA Committee inks settlement with Indian business body

 The UAE-India Cepa Committee (UICC) marked a reminder of grasping (MoU) with the Indian Office of Business (ICC) on Thursday, beginning an essential organization to reinforce monetary and exchange ties between the UAE and India. In arrangement with their separate commands, the UICC and the ICC will synergise endeavors, assets, and thoughts, and work together on expanding mindfulness inside the two nations of the critical capability of the UAE-India respective monetary association. The MoU lays out an expansive based organization between the members, zeroed in on the public advancement of the UAE-India two-sided monetary association and the UAE-India Cepa specifically. The two associations will team up on expanding mindfulness inside the UAE and India with respect to the huge capability of the reciprocal financial organization, featuring open doors for UAE and Indian organizations to use the UAE-India Cepa, and activating key UAE and Indian confidential area partners to help expand...

The Impact of Islamist Agendas on Governance and State Stability

  The current emergence of Islamist groups in Syria most especially Hayat Tahir al-Sham has raised damaging discourses concerning their goals as well as the future of Syria. One of them is their operational topping in the seizing of state institutions, which if achieved, will really alter the socio-political landscape of the Syria in a big way. New policies as the reform of the education system show how HTS tries to exercise control over institutions. The changes in curriculum proposed are eradicating all references to Assad’s regime, changing the religious material, and erasing concepts like evolution. Opponents state that these changes insert an Islamists’ attributes, which might completely eliminate Syrian secular learning legacy and make the divides in society wider. The Islamists continue with the appointment of people with extremists linkages to other strategic governmental positions, the above strategies confirm. For example, the appointment of Shadi al-Waisi, who used to be...