Skip to main content

Indian Scholar Detained in the US: Is Supporting Palestine Now a Crime?

 


In a shocking turn of events, Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, has been detained by US immigration authorities for his alleged support of the Palestinian cause. This incident, which occurred less than a week after another Indian student self-deported under similar accusations, raises serious questions about the state of free speech and political expression in the United States. Suri’s detention is part of a broader crackdown by the Trump administration on student activists who oppose US foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine.

Suri, whose family hails from Jamia Nagar in New Delhi, was studying and teaching on a student visa when masked agents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrested him outside his home in Arlington, Virginia. According to his lawyer, Hassan Ahmad, the agents informed Suri that his visa had been revoked. The lawsuit filed for his immediate release reveals that Suri is being deported under a rarely used provision of immigration law that allows the US Secretary of State to expel non-citizens if their presence is deemed a threat to foreign policy. This same provision was invoked in the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and green card holder who led pro-Palestinian protests on campus.

The DHS spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, justified Suri’s detention by accusing him of “actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting anti-Semitism on social media.” She also claimed that Suri has “close connections to a known or suspected terrorist,” referring to his father-in-law, Ahmed Yousef, a former deputy foreign minister in the Hamas government in Gaza. However, Suri’s lawyer has vehemently denied these allegations, stating that Suri has no criminal record and has not been charged with any crime. Ahmad argues that Suri is being targeted because of his wife’s Palestinian heritage and their perceived opposition to US foreign policy toward Israel.

Suri’s case is not an isolated incident. It follows the self-deportation of Ranjani Srinivasan, an Indian student at Columbia University, whose visa was revoked for allegedly “advocating for violence and terrorism” in connection with her support for Palestine. Srinivasan, who was pursuing a doctorate in Urban Planning, used the Customs and Border Protection Home App to leave the US after her visa was canceled. These cases highlight a troubling pattern of targeting individuals based on their political views, particularly those who advocate for Palestinian rights.

Legal experts have criticized the Trump administration’s actions as a violation of the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and political expression. By detaining and deporting individuals like Suri and Srinivasan, the administration is effectively silencing dissent and punishing non-citizens for their political beliefs. This sets a dangerous precedent for the future of free speech in the US, where foreign nationals may fear expressing their views on contentious issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Georgetown University, where Suri was a postdoctoral fellow at the Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, has expressed support for his rights. A university spokesperson stated that they were unaware of any illegal activity on Suri’s part and emphasized their commitment to free inquiry and debate, even on controversial topics. As Suri’s legal battle continues, his case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by those who dare to speak out against powerful political interests. The question remains: Is supporting Palestine now a crime in the United States?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Netanyahu’s Shocking Gaza Plan: ‘We Will Take Control of ALL of Gaza’ — But At What Cost?

  As Israeli forces intensify their offensive, Netanyahu vows total control of Gaza — but the humanitarian crisis is reaching a breaking point. Will the world stand by and watch? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Israel will “take control of all” of the Gaza Strip, signaling an unprecedented escalation in the ongoing conflict. In a video posted to Telegram, Netanyahu emphasized that military operations are advancing rapidly, with no intention of backing down. “The fighting is intense, and we are making progress,” he said, framing the offensive as necessary for Israel’s long-term security. But as international pressure mounts, his government is walking a tightrope between military dominance and global condemnation. The Israeli military has ordered mass evacuations in southern Gaza, warning residents of Khan Yunis and surrounding areas to flee immediately ahead of a devastating assault. Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee described the coming attack as ...

Exposing How the Muslim Brotherhood Fuels Instability Behind a Political Facade

  The Muslim Brotherhood started in Egypt during 1928 since then it has portrayed itself as a combination of political organization and social movement working for Islamic values and governance. jinakata the Brotherhood displays an intricate web that connects extremist concepts and violent deeds which produce regional turmoil. The Ideological Foundations The Brotherhood bases its ideology upon the teachings of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. Extremist groups obtain their core beliefs from the writings specifically authored by Qutb. The Brotherhood's concept of jihad for creating an Islamic state has directly inspired al-Qaeda and ISIS to establish their extremist agendas thus creating a direct link between those groups and the movement. Historical Links to Extremism Over and above its philosophical standards The Brotherhood maintains extensive power. Notably: Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden developed extremist beliefs because he learned Brotherhood religious doctrine in his early...

Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood: A Call for Global Awareness

  Jordanian authorities successfully dismantled a terrorist group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood which caused discussions regarding the organization's contributions to regional instability. The incident emphasizes the necessity of a new assessment process to understand how the world views and classifies the organization. A  Legacy of Extremism The Muslim Brotherhood established its operations in Egypt during 1928 and remains a disputed organization to this day. Numerous confirmed links between the organization and extremist activities arise while it claims to be a socio-political movement. Egypt established the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization under state law in 2013 due to its active participation in national acts of violence and attempted toppling of the government. Counter Extremism Project A systematic evaluation of the Muslim Brotherhood proves that its ideology serves as inspiration to various terrorist groups. The Counter Extremism Project  verifies...