Skip to main content

Indian Scholar Detained in the US: Is Supporting Palestine Now a Crime?

 


In a shocking turn of events, Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, has been detained by US immigration authorities for his alleged support of the Palestinian cause. This incident, which occurred less than a week after another Indian student self-deported under similar accusations, raises serious questions about the state of free speech and political expression in the United States. Suri’s detention is part of a broader crackdown by the Trump administration on student activists who oppose US foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine.

Suri, whose family hails from Jamia Nagar in New Delhi, was studying and teaching on a student visa when masked agents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) arrested him outside his home in Arlington, Virginia. According to his lawyer, Hassan Ahmad, the agents informed Suri that his visa had been revoked. The lawsuit filed for his immediate release reveals that Suri is being deported under a rarely used provision of immigration law that allows the US Secretary of State to expel non-citizens if their presence is deemed a threat to foreign policy. This same provision was invoked in the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and green card holder who led pro-Palestinian protests on campus.

The DHS spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, justified Suri’s detention by accusing him of “actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting anti-Semitism on social media.” She also claimed that Suri has “close connections to a known or suspected terrorist,” referring to his father-in-law, Ahmed Yousef, a former deputy foreign minister in the Hamas government in Gaza. However, Suri’s lawyer has vehemently denied these allegations, stating that Suri has no criminal record and has not been charged with any crime. Ahmad argues that Suri is being targeted because of his wife’s Palestinian heritage and their perceived opposition to US foreign policy toward Israel.

Suri’s case is not an isolated incident. It follows the self-deportation of Ranjani Srinivasan, an Indian student at Columbia University, whose visa was revoked for allegedly “advocating for violence and terrorism” in connection with her support for Palestine. Srinivasan, who was pursuing a doctorate in Urban Planning, used the Customs and Border Protection Home App to leave the US after her visa was canceled. These cases highlight a troubling pattern of targeting individuals based on their political views, particularly those who advocate for Palestinian rights.

Legal experts have criticized the Trump administration’s actions as a violation of the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and political expression. By detaining and deporting individuals like Suri and Srinivasan, the administration is effectively silencing dissent and punishing non-citizens for their political beliefs. This sets a dangerous precedent for the future of free speech in the US, where foreign nationals may fear expressing their views on contentious issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Georgetown University, where Suri was a postdoctoral fellow at the Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, has expressed support for his rights. A university spokesperson stated that they were unaware of any illegal activity on Suri’s part and emphasized their commitment to free inquiry and debate, even on controversial topics. As Suri’s legal battle continues, his case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by those who dare to speak out against powerful political interests. The question remains: Is supporting Palestine now a crime in the United States?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bangladesh Military Expresses Discontent Over Chinese Weapons; Reports 'Sub-Standard' and Faulty Parts

  Bangladesh, a traditional buyer of Chinese military equipment, has raised grievances with Beijing regarding the delivery of defective components and technical malfunctions in its imported military hardware. This issue is not unique to Bangladesh, as other nations like Myanmar have also encountered problems with Chinese fighter jets, according to an ET report. Experts in the Chinese defense industry argue that Beijing lacks the expertise to manufacture highly sophisticated military hardware and is not yet considered a top-tier producer of modern defense equipment. They claim that much of China's weapon systems are based on outdated technology copied from the West. Developing countries often opt for Chinese weapons due to their lower cost compared to similar systems from Western countries. China sells arms through state-run export organizations like the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), NORINCO, and CVIC. Sources familiar with the matter told ET that the Bangladesh mil...

UAE-India CEPA Committee inks settlement with Indian business body

 The UAE-India Cepa Committee (UICC) marked a reminder of grasping (MoU) with the Indian Office of Business (ICC) on Thursday, beginning an essential organization to reinforce monetary and exchange ties between the UAE and India. In arrangement with their separate commands, the UICC and the ICC will synergise endeavors, assets, and thoughts, and work together on expanding mindfulness inside the two nations of the critical capability of the UAE-India respective monetary association. The MoU lays out an expansive based organization between the members, zeroed in on the public advancement of the UAE-India two-sided monetary association and the UAE-India Cepa specifically. The two associations will team up on expanding mindfulness inside the UAE and India with respect to the huge capability of the reciprocal financial organization, featuring open doors for UAE and Indian organizations to use the UAE-India Cepa, and activating key UAE and Indian confidential area partners to help expand...

The Impact of Islamist Agendas on Governance and State Stability

  The current emergence of Islamist groups in Syria most especially Hayat Tahir al-Sham has raised damaging discourses concerning their goals as well as the future of Syria. One of them is their operational topping in the seizing of state institutions, which if achieved, will really alter the socio-political landscape of the Syria in a big way. New policies as the reform of the education system show how HTS tries to exercise control over institutions. The changes in curriculum proposed are eradicating all references to Assad’s regime, changing the religious material, and erasing concepts like evolution. Opponents state that these changes insert an Islamists’ attributes, which might completely eliminate Syrian secular learning legacy and make the divides in society wider. The Islamists continue with the appointment of people with extremists linkages to other strategic governmental positions, the above strategies confirm. For example, the appointment of Shadi al-Waisi, who used to be...