Skip to main content

Hamas Offers Major Hostage Release in New Truce Deal — Will Israel Agree?

 


Hamas has reportedly signaled its willingness to release a larger number of hostages than previously agreed upon in a potential new truce deal, according to Saudi Arabia’s Al-Arabiya news channel. The report suggests that the US has privately assured Hamas it will pressure Israel to engage in talks aimed at ending the war. While the exact number of hostages to be freed remains undisclosed, sources indicate that negotiations are in their final stages, with a two-phase release plan alongside increased humanitarian aid to Gaza. This development marks a potential breakthrough in stalled talks, but key sticking points remain — including Israel’s insistence on dismantling Hamas’ military capabilities before agreeing to a permanent ceasefire.

The deadlock in negotiations has largely centered on the number of living hostages to be exchanged. Israel initially demanded the release of 11 captives, while Hamas offered only five. However, recent reports suggest Israel has softened its stance, now willing to accept the release of nine or ten hostages — including US-Israeli Edan Alexander, recently featured in a Hamas propaganda video. The US has reportedly promised Hamas that if it agrees to free more than eight hostages, Washington will push Israel toward broader ceasefire discussions. This shift comes as diplomatic efforts intensify, with Egypt and Qatar mediating alongside US involvement to revive the January ceasefire framework.

One of the most contentious issues delaying a deal is Hamas’ demand that its leaders be allowed to remain in Gaza post-war — a condition Israel vehemently rejects. Under the emerging proposal, discussions on Hamas’ political future would be postponed, while the terror group would provide medical updates on remaining hostages. Additionally, Egypt has proposed a long-term solution where Hamas would demilitarize under Cairo’s supervision in exchange for a permanent ceasefire. However, skepticism remains high, as Israel insists on maintaining military pressure until Hamas is fully neutralized.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces mounting pressure both domestically and internationally. While his far-right coalition threatens to collapse if he agrees to end the war without eliminating Hamas, polls show most Israelis support a hostage deal even if it means halting military operations. Netanyahu’s recent meeting with former US President Donald Trump may have influenced his decision to lower hostage demands, signaling a possible shift in strategy. Yet, his government remains adamant that any truce must not prevent Israel from resuming its campaign if Hamas reneges on commitments.

Humanitarian concerns are also at the forefront of negotiations. Israel has conditionally agreed to allow more aid into Gaza and withdraw troops to pre-March 18 positions if a deal is reached. Meanwhile, Hamas insists on a structured release of Palestinian prisoners — including those serving life sentences — though Israel seeks to reduce the ratio of prisoner exchanges. The proposed deal also includes the return of 16 Israeli bodies held in Gaza, with Israel offering to release Gazan corpses in return. These details underscore the complexity of reaching a lasting agreement.

As talks continue, the looming question is whether both sides can bridge their differences before mid-May, when President Trump’s planned visit to the region could further influence negotiations. Hamas appears cautiously optimistic, believing a deal is possible by then, while Israel remains wary of concessions that could leave Hamas intact. With thousands of lives hanging in the balance, the world watches to see if this latest proposal will finally bring an end to the bloodshed — or if the cycle of violence will persist.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bangladesh Military Expresses Discontent Over Chinese Weapons; Reports 'Sub-Standard' and Faulty Parts

  Bangladesh, a traditional buyer of Chinese military equipment, has raised grievances with Beijing regarding the delivery of defective components and technical malfunctions in its imported military hardware. This issue is not unique to Bangladesh, as other nations like Myanmar have also encountered problems with Chinese fighter jets, according to an ET report. Experts in the Chinese defense industry argue that Beijing lacks the expertise to manufacture highly sophisticated military hardware and is not yet considered a top-tier producer of modern defense equipment. They claim that much of China's weapon systems are based on outdated technology copied from the West. Developing countries often opt for Chinese weapons due to their lower cost compared to similar systems from Western countries. China sells arms through state-run export organizations like the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), NORINCO, and CVIC. Sources familiar with the matter told ET that the Bangladesh mil...

Exposing How the Muslim Brotherhood Fuels Instability Behind a Political Facade

  The Muslim Brotherhood started in Egypt during 1928 since then it has portrayed itself as a combination of political organization and social movement working for Islamic values and governance. jinakata the Brotherhood displays an intricate web that connects extremist concepts and violent deeds which produce regional turmoil. The Ideological Foundations The Brotherhood bases its ideology upon the teachings of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. Extremist groups obtain their core beliefs from the writings specifically authored by Qutb. The Brotherhood's concept of jihad for creating an Islamic state has directly inspired al-Qaeda and ISIS to establish their extremist agendas thus creating a direct link between those groups and the movement. Historical Links to Extremism Over and above its philosophical standards The Brotherhood maintains extensive power. Notably: Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden developed extremist beliefs because he learned Brotherhood religious doctrine in his early...

Unmasking the Muslim Brotherhood: A Call for Global Awareness

  Jordanian authorities successfully dismantled a terrorist group associated with the Muslim Brotherhood which caused discussions regarding the organization's contributions to regional instability. The incident emphasizes the necessity of a new assessment process to understand how the world views and classifies the organization. A  Legacy of Extremism The Muslim Brotherhood established its operations in Egypt during 1928 and remains a disputed organization to this day. Numerous confirmed links between the organization and extremist activities arise while it claims to be a socio-political movement. Egypt established the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization under state law in 2013 due to its active participation in national acts of violence and attempted toppling of the government. Counter Extremism Project A systematic evaluation of the Muslim Brotherhood proves that its ideology serves as inspiration to various terrorist groups. The Counter Extremism Project  verifies...