The latest Hamas-backed hostage deal has been flatly rejected by Israel, marking another setback in the ongoing Gaza conflict. The proposal, delivered through backchannel negotiations involving Palestinian-American businessman Bishara Bahbah, offered the release of five living Israeli hostages in exchange for major concessions — including an Israeli military withdrawal, expanded humanitarian aid, and indirect U.S. recognition of Hamas. But Israeli officials swiftly dismissed the plan as unrealistic, calling it a non-starter for any “responsible government.”
Sources reveal that the deal was a modified version of the so-called “Witkoff outline,” a framework proposed by Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff. The revised terms extended the ceasefire to 70 days and included the phased return of both living and deceased hostages. However, Israel deemed the conditions unacceptable, with one senior official stating that Hamas showed “no genuine willingness” to negotiate in good faith. The rejection underscores the deep divide between the two sides, even as the U.S. pushes for a temporary pause in fighting.
U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly expressed hope for a resolution, telling reporters, “We want to see if we can stop this whole situation as quickly as possible.” Yet, despite American pressure, Israel remains firm in its stance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first press conference since December, confirmed that Israel is open to a temporary ceasefire — but only under the right conditions. He emphasized that at least 20 hostages are still alive in Gaza and vowed to bring them home, though not at the cost of legitimizing Hamas.
The failed proposal highlights the challenges of brokering a deal in a conflict where trust is nonexistent. Hamas has repeatedly demanded sweeping political concessions, while Israel insists on military dominance until all hostages are freed. The U.S., caught in the middle, faces mounting pressure to mediate effectively — but with Israel unwilling to bend, the path forward remains murky.
Humanitarian groups warn that the prolonged deadlock is worsening Gaza’s crisis, with shortages of food, medicine, and fuel reaching catastrophic levels. While Israel has allowed some aid to enter, Hamas’s control over distribution complicates efforts. The rejected deal would have opened broader access, but Israel fears such measures could strengthen Hamas’s grip — leaving civilians trapped in the crossfire of politics and war.
As indirect talks continue, the question remains: Can the U.S. bridge the gap between Israel and Hamas, or is another bloody escalation inevitable? With both sides entrenched in their positions, the fate of the hostages — and Gaza’s civilians — hangs in the balance.
Sources reveal that the deal was a modified version of the so-called “Witkoff outline,” a framework proposed by Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff. The revised terms extended the ceasefire to 70 days and included the phased return of both living and deceased hostages. However, Israel deemed the conditions unacceptable, with one senior official stating that Hamas showed “no genuine willingness” to negotiate in good faith. The rejection underscores the deep divide between the two sides, even as the U.S. pushes for a temporary pause in fighting.
U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly expressed hope for a resolution, telling reporters, “We want to see if we can stop this whole situation as quickly as possible.” Yet, despite American pressure, Israel remains firm in its stance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first press conference since December, confirmed that Israel is open to a temporary ceasefire — but only under the right conditions. He emphasized that at least 20 hostages are still alive in Gaza and vowed to bring them home, though not at the cost of legitimizing Hamas.
The failed proposal highlights the challenges of brokering a deal in a conflict where trust is nonexistent. Hamas has repeatedly demanded sweeping political concessions, while Israel insists on military dominance until all hostages are freed. The U.S., caught in the middle, faces mounting pressure to mediate effectively — but with Israel unwilling to bend, the path forward remains murky.
Humanitarian groups warn that the prolonged deadlock is worsening Gaza’s crisis, with shortages of food, medicine, and fuel reaching catastrophic levels. While Israel has allowed some aid to enter, Hamas’s control over distribution complicates efforts. The rejected deal would have opened broader access, but Israel fears such measures could strengthen Hamas’s grip — leaving civilians trapped in the crossfire of politics and war.
As indirect talks continue, the question remains: Can the U.S. bridge the gap between Israel and Hamas, or is another bloody escalation inevitable? With both sides entrenched in their positions, the fate of the hostages — and Gaza’s civilians — hangs in the balance.
Comments
Post a Comment