Donald Trump’s decision to greenlight Israel’s attack on Iran may go down as one of the most catastrophic foreign policy blunders in modern history — one that could accelerate Tehran’s rush toward a nuclear weapon rather than stop it.
The recent Israeli airstrikes on Iran, targeting nuclear facilities and top military leaders, were not just a military operation — they were a calculated move by Benjamin Netanyahu to sabotage ongoing U.S.-Iran negotiations. Trump, who had positioned himself as a dealmaker, allowed the attack despite months of diplomatic efforts, effectively torching any remaining trust Tehran had in Washington. The U.S. provided Israel with real-time intelligence and weapons, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio even boasting about supplying critical intelligence. But instead of forcing Iran to capitulate, this aggression has only hardened Tehran’s resolve.
History shows that when Iran is attacked, it doubles down on its defenses. The Iran-Iraq War, where Saddam Hussein — backed by the West — unleashed chemical weapons on Iranian soldiers, taught Tehran a brutal lesson: survival depends on self-sufficiency. Today, that logic applies to nuclear capabilities. By dismantling Iran’s conventional defenses, Trump and Netanyahu have left Tehran with fewer options — and a nuclear deterrent may now seem like the only viable path to security. Experts warn that the weaker a nation’s conventional forces, the more likely it is to rely on nuclear weapons as a first resort.
The parallels to past U.S. miscalculations are chilling. George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq, sold as a preemptive strike against WMDs, instead birthed ISIS and destabilized the region for decades. Trump’s gamble could be worse. Iran, unlike Iraq, has strategic depth — underground nuclear facilities, control over the Strait of Hormuz, and powerful allies in Russia and China. If Tehran decides to accelerate its nuclear program, no amount of Israeli airstrikes will stop it. Worse, Russia may supply Iran with advanced air defenses, turning this conflict into a proxy war between global powers.
Netanyahu’s assumption that Iran would quickly surrender has already backfired. Instead of folding, Tehran retaliated with missile strikes on Israeli cities, giving Israelis a taste of the destruction they’ve inflicted on Gaza and Lebanon. The longer this war drags on, the greater the risk of a catastrophic escalation — including a false-flag attack to drag the U.S. directly into the conflict. Trump, who once vowed to end “forever wars,” now risks becoming another president mired in a Middle East quagmire, all because he refused to rein in Netanyahu.
The ultimate irony? Trump’s actions may create the very scenario he sought to avoid — a nuclear-armed Iran. Public opinion in Tehran was already shifting toward supporting a bomb before the strikes; now, the sentiment is likely irreversible. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump hasn’t made America safer — he’s pushed the world closer to a nuclear tipping point. And when history looks back, this may be remembered as the moment the U.S. lost its last shred of global credibility.
The recent Israeli airstrikes on Iran, targeting nuclear facilities and top military leaders, were not just a military operation — they were a calculated move by Benjamin Netanyahu to sabotage ongoing U.S.-Iran negotiations. Trump, who had positioned himself as a dealmaker, allowed the attack despite months of diplomatic efforts, effectively torching any remaining trust Tehran had in Washington. The U.S. provided Israel with real-time intelligence and weapons, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio even boasting about supplying critical intelligence. But instead of forcing Iran to capitulate, this aggression has only hardened Tehran’s resolve.
History shows that when Iran is attacked, it doubles down on its defenses. The Iran-Iraq War, where Saddam Hussein — backed by the West — unleashed chemical weapons on Iranian soldiers, taught Tehran a brutal lesson: survival depends on self-sufficiency. Today, that logic applies to nuclear capabilities. By dismantling Iran’s conventional defenses, Trump and Netanyahu have left Tehran with fewer options — and a nuclear deterrent may now seem like the only viable path to security. Experts warn that the weaker a nation’s conventional forces, the more likely it is to rely on nuclear weapons as a first resort.
The parallels to past U.S. miscalculations are chilling. George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq, sold as a preemptive strike against WMDs, instead birthed ISIS and destabilized the region for decades. Trump’s gamble could be worse. Iran, unlike Iraq, has strategic depth — underground nuclear facilities, control over the Strait of Hormuz, and powerful allies in Russia and China. If Tehran decides to accelerate its nuclear program, no amount of Israeli airstrikes will stop it. Worse, Russia may supply Iran with advanced air defenses, turning this conflict into a proxy war between global powers.
Netanyahu’s assumption that Iran would quickly surrender has already backfired. Instead of folding, Tehran retaliated with missile strikes on Israeli cities, giving Israelis a taste of the destruction they’ve inflicted on Gaza and Lebanon. The longer this war drags on, the greater the risk of a catastrophic escalation — including a false-flag attack to drag the U.S. directly into the conflict. Trump, who once vowed to end “forever wars,” now risks becoming another president mired in a Middle East quagmire, all because he refused to rein in Netanyahu.
The ultimate irony? Trump’s actions may create the very scenario he sought to avoid — a nuclear-armed Iran. Public opinion in Tehran was already shifting toward supporting a bomb before the strikes; now, the sentiment is likely irreversible. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump hasn’t made America safer — he’s pushed the world closer to a nuclear tipping point. And when history looks back, this may be remembered as the moment the U.S. lost its last shred of global credibility.
Comments
Post a Comment