The United States has once again wielded its veto power at the UN Security Council, blocking a resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza. The move has drawn fierce backlash from the international community, with 14 out of 15 council members voting in favor of the measure. The resolution, proposed by ten nations, also called for the release of all hostages and unrestricted humanitarian aid access—a critical demand as Gaza faces famine-like conditions. But the US argued that the draft failed to condemn Hamas or demand its disarmament, calling it counterproductive to ongoing diplomatic efforts.
Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea defended the veto, stating that the resolution would only embolden Hamas without addressing the group’s role in perpetuating the conflict. Israel has repeatedly insisted that any ceasefire must be conditional on Hamas surrendering and relinquishing control of Gaza. Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon went further, accusing Security Council members of choosing "appeasement and submission" rather than a path to lasting peace. The sharp divide highlights the deepening geopolitical rift over how to resolve the war, now in its ninth month.
Meanwhile, Gaza’s humanitarian crisis worsens by the day. International organizations warn that famine is imminent, with aid deliveries still severely restricted despite Israel lifting an 11-week blockade last month. The UN and aid agencies blame Israel for obstructing relief efforts, while Israel accuses Hamas of diverting supplies. The US and Israel have pushed for a controversial new aid distribution system led by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which relies on private security firms—a move rejected by the UN as non-neutral and militarized.
Hamas condemned the US veto as proof of Washington’s "blind bias" toward Israel, further inflaming tensions. The group, which triggered the war with its October 7 attack, remains entrenched in Gaza, and Israel shows no signs of halting its military campaign. Over 54,000 Palestinians have reportedly been killed, though the figures—provided by Hamas-run health authorities—remain unverified. With no ceasefire in sight, civilians continue to bear the brunt of the violence, as evidenced by the 45 lives lost in Israeli strikes just hours before the UN vote.
The failed resolution has shifted attention to the UN General Assembly, where a similar proposal is expected to pass. Unlike the Security Council, no single nation can veto decisions in the General Assembly, meaning global condemnation of the US and Israel is all but guaranteed. However, as Danon warned, Israel remains undeterred: "No resolution, no vote, no moral failure will stand in our way." The statement underscores the grim reality—diplomatic efforts are stalling while Gaza burns.
As the world grapples with the fallout, key questions remain: Will the General Assembly’s vote pressure the US to reconsider its stance? Can aid reach Gaza without becoming a political weapon? And most urgently—how many more lives will be lost before the fighting stops? With no clear answers, the path to peace seems further away than ever.
Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea defended the veto, stating that the resolution would only embolden Hamas without addressing the group’s role in perpetuating the conflict. Israel has repeatedly insisted that any ceasefire must be conditional on Hamas surrendering and relinquishing control of Gaza. Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon went further, accusing Security Council members of choosing "appeasement and submission" rather than a path to lasting peace. The sharp divide highlights the deepening geopolitical rift over how to resolve the war, now in its ninth month.
Meanwhile, Gaza’s humanitarian crisis worsens by the day. International organizations warn that famine is imminent, with aid deliveries still severely restricted despite Israel lifting an 11-week blockade last month. The UN and aid agencies blame Israel for obstructing relief efforts, while Israel accuses Hamas of diverting supplies. The US and Israel have pushed for a controversial new aid distribution system led by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which relies on private security firms—a move rejected by the UN as non-neutral and militarized.
Hamas condemned the US veto as proof of Washington’s "blind bias" toward Israel, further inflaming tensions. The group, which triggered the war with its October 7 attack, remains entrenched in Gaza, and Israel shows no signs of halting its military campaign. Over 54,000 Palestinians have reportedly been killed, though the figures—provided by Hamas-run health authorities—remain unverified. With no ceasefire in sight, civilians continue to bear the brunt of the violence, as evidenced by the 45 lives lost in Israeli strikes just hours before the UN vote.
The failed resolution has shifted attention to the UN General Assembly, where a similar proposal is expected to pass. Unlike the Security Council, no single nation can veto decisions in the General Assembly, meaning global condemnation of the US and Israel is all but guaranteed. However, as Danon warned, Israel remains undeterred: "No resolution, no vote, no moral failure will stand in our way." The statement underscores the grim reality—diplomatic efforts are stalling while Gaza burns.
As the world grapples with the fallout, key questions remain: Will the General Assembly’s vote pressure the US to reconsider its stance? Can aid reach Gaza without becoming a political weapon? And most urgently—how many more lives will be lost before the fighting stops? With no clear answers, the path to peace seems further away than ever.
Comments
Post a Comment